- Hisashi Tawiah 45'
- Alex Negueba 56'
- Marco Túlio 60'
- Rafael Elias 67'
- Alex Negueba 84'
- Patrick Wood (pen) 13'
- Patrick Wood (pen) 45'
Asia · AFC Champions League Elite
Position
6
R16Played
3
Points
6
2W 0D 1L
Goal difference
+3
6 scored, 3 against
Form
From 8,000 simulated seasons.
Win the leagueest.
1.6%
Top fourest.
15.5%
European placeest.
0.0%
Relegationest.
0.0%
Projected pointsest.
14
likely 10–18
Projected finishest.
10th
range 4–18
Power rating
1507
#11 in the division
Attack / defenceest.
78 / 80
75 is league average
20 players from 3 countries.
| Player | Nationality | Minutes | G | A | Share of goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GK | |||||
| 90Halls | Brazil | 180 | 0 | 0 | — |
| DF | |||||
| 5Hisashi Tawiah | Japan | 180 | 1 | 0 | 17% |
| 43Weverton | Brazil | 180 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 44Kyo Sato | Japan | 180 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 26Ren Kato | Japan | 15 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 15Kodai Nagata | Japan | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| MF | |||||
| 25Sung-Jun Yoon | South Korea | 180 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 62Takaaki Shichi | Japan | 179 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 10Shimpei Fukuoka | Japan | 110 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 48Ryuma Nakano | Japan | 93 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 6João Pedro | Brazil | 72 | 0 | 0 | — |
| —Thiago | — | 45 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 24Hiroto Morooka | Japan | 25 | 0 | 0 | — |
| FW | |||||
| 11Marco Túlio | Brazil | 123 | 1 | 1 | 17% |
| 77Haruki Arai | Japan | 116 | 0 | 2 | — |
| 38Maceió | Brazil | 104 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 17Alex Negueba | Brazil | 76 | 2 | 1 | 33% |
| 9Rafael Elias | Brazil | 72 | 1 | 0 | 17% |
| 18Temma Matsuda | Japan | 31 | 1 | 0 | 17% |
| 7Masaya Okugawa | Japan | 18 | 0 | 1 | — |
Ordered by minutes within each position, so the first-choice side sits at the top. Share of goals is measured against this squad’s 6 in the same matches these minutes come from — never against the league table, whose season is longer than the window player data covers. That window is 30 of 47 matches.
First place is at the top. A change of division breaks the line, because 8th in one is not 8th in another.
| Season | Competition | Pos | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026/2027 | J. League | 14 of 20 | 13 |
| 2026 | J. League | 8 of 10 | 23 |
| 2025 | J. League | 3 of 20 | 68 |
| 2024 | J. League | 14 of 20 | 47 |
| 2023 | J. League | 13 of 18 | 40 |
| 2022 | J. League | 16 of 18 | 36 |
| 2021 | J. League 2 | 2 of 22 | 84 |
| 2020 | J. League 2 | 8 of 22 | 59 |
| 2019 | J. League 2 | 8 of 22 | 68 |
| 2018 | J. League 2 | 19 of 22 | 43 |
| 2017 | J. League 2 | 12 of 22 | 57 |
| 2016 | J. League 2 | 5 of 22 | 69 |
| 2015 | J. League 2 | 17 of 22 | 50 |
| 2014 | J. League 2 | 9 of 22 | 60 |
| 2013 | J. League 2 | 3 of 22 | 70 |
| 2012 | J. League 2 | 3 of 22 | 74 |
| 2011 | J. League 2 | 7 of 20 | 58 |
| Season | Manager | W–D–L | Pts / game |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026/2027 | Ranko PopovićJ. League | 3–4–6 | 1.00 |
| 2026 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League | 8–0–10 | 1.33 |
| 2025 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League | 19–11–8 | 1.79 |
| 2024 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League | 12–11–15 | 1.24 |
| 2023 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League Cup | 3–0–3 | 1.50 |
| 2023 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League | 12–4–18 | 1.18 |
| 2022 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League Cup | 3–1–2 | 1.67 |
| 2022 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League | 8–12–14 | 1.06 |
| 2021 | Gwi-Jea JoJ. League 2 | 24–12–6 | 2.00 |
| 2016 | Kiyotaka IshimaruJ. League 2 | 18–15–9 | 1.64 |
| 2015 | Kiyotaka IshimaruJ. League 2 | 6–10–4 | 1.40 |
| 2013 | Takeshi OkiJ. League 2 | 20–10–12 | 1.67 |
| 2012 | Takeshi OkiJ. League 2 | 23–5–14 | 1.76 |
One row per season, which is the grain the source supplies — a manager who stayed four years appears four times. Points per game is what makes spells of different lengths comparable.
Results
| # | Club | Pl | GD | Pts | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | +3 | 7 | Recent form, oldest first: D, W, W | 3% | |
| 4 | 3 | +2 | 6 | Recent form, oldest first: W, W, L | 1% | |
| 5 | 3 | +1 | 6 | Recent form, oldest first: W, W, L | 1% | |
| 6 | 3 | +2 | 5 | Recent form, oldest first: D, D, W | <1% | |
| 7 | 3 | +1 | 5 | Recent form, oldest first: W, D, D | <1% | |
| 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | Recent form, oldest first: D, L, W | <1% | |
| 9 | 3 | -2 | 3 | Recent form, oldest first: W, L, L | <1% |
* Level on points — separated by the tiebreaker shown on hover.
Title chances are Monte Carlo estimates over the remaining fixturesest. A shown 0% means it did not occur in 8,000 simulated seasons — not that it is impossible.