- Jeremy Dudziak 34'
- Gang Wang 52'
- Bruno Mota 2'
- Yeong-Jae Lee 64'
Asia · AFC Champions League Elite
Position
10
OUTPlayed
3
Points
4
1W 1D 1L
Goal difference
-1
4 scored, 5 against
Form
From 8,000 simulated seasons.
Win the leagueest.
<1%
Top fourest.
1.1%
European placeest.
0.0%
Relegationest.
0.0%
Projected pointsest.
10
likely 6–14
Projected finishest.
19th
range 10–27
Power rating
1498
#18 in the division
Attack / defenceest.
73 / 74
75 is league average
19 players from 4 countries.
| Player | Nationality | Minutes | G | A | Share of goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GK | |||||
| 31Bum-Keun Song | South Korea | 180 | 0 | 0 | — |
| DF | |||||
| 5Ji-Soo Park | South Korea | 180 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2Young-Bin Kim | South Korea | 180 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 66Woo-Jin Choi | South Korea | 180 | 0 | 1 | — |
| 77Tae-Hyun Kim | South Korea | 90 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 27Seung-Jun Hwang | South Korea | 60 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 3Je-Woon Yeon | South Korea | 30 | 0 | 0 | — |
| MF | |||||
| 97Jin-Gyu Kim | South Korea | 162 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 13Sang-Yun Kang | South Korea | 110 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 16João Gamboa | Portugal | 108 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 28Yeong-Jae Lee | South Korea | 88 | 1 | 0 | 50% |
| 6Seong-Ung Maeng | South Korea | 72 | 0 | 0 | — |
| FW | |||||
| 99Bruno Mota | Brazil | 178 | 1 | 0 | 50% |
| 95Italo | Brazil | 128 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 11Seung-Sub Kim | South Korea | 90 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 7Dong-Jun Lee | South Korea | 70 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 10Seung-Woo Lee | South Korea | 65 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 9Tiago Orobó | Brazil | 7 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 96Andrea Compagno | Italy | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
Ordered by minutes within each position, so the first-choice side sits at the top. Share of goals is measured against this squad’s 2 in the same matches these minutes come from — never against the league table, whose season is longer than the window player data covers. That window is 30 of 47 matches.
First place is at the top. A change of division breaks the line, because 8th in one is not 8th in another.
| Season | Competition | Pos | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | K League 1 | 5 of 12 | 49 |
| 2025 | K League 1 | 1 of 12 | 79 |
| 2024 | K League 1 | 10 of 12 | 42 |
| 2023 | K League 1 | 4 of 12 | 57 |
| 2022 | K League 1 | 2 of 12 | 73 |
| 2021 | K League 1 | 1 of 12 | 76 |
| 2020 | K League 1 | 1 of 6 | 60 |
| 2019 | K League 1 | 1 of 6 | 79 |
| 2018 | K League 1 | 1 of 12 | 86 |
| 2017 | K League 1 | 1 of 12 | 75 |
| 2016 | K League 1 | 2 of 12 | 67 |
| 2015 | K League 1 | 1 of 12 | 73 |
| 2014 | K League 1 | 1 of 12 | 81 |
| 2013 | K League 1 | 3 of 14 | 63 |
| 2012 | K League 1 | 2 of 16 | 79 |
| 2011 | K League 1 | 1 of 16 | 63 |
| 2010 | K League 1 | 3 of 15 | 51 |
| Season | Manager | W–D–L | Pts / game |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jeong-Yong ChungK League 1 | 12–13–9 | 1.44 |
| 2025 | Gustavo PoyetK League 1 | 23–10–5 | 2.08 |
| 2024 | Dan PetrescuK League 1 | 0–3–2 | 0.60 |
| 2024 | Won-Jae ParkK League 1 | 3–2–4 | 1.22 |
| 2023 | Sang-Sik KimK League 1 | 3–1–6 | 1.00 |
| 2023 | Dan PetrescuK League 1 | 8–6–6 | 1.50 |
| 2022 | Sang-Sik KimK League 1 | 21–10–7 | 1.92 |
| 2021 | Sang-Sik KimK League 1 | 22–10–6 | 2.00 |
| 2020 | José MoraisK League 1 | 3–0–1 | 2.25 |
| 2020 | Sang-Sik KimK League 1 | 16–3–4 | 2.22 |
| 2019 | José MoraisK League 1 | 22–13–3 | 2.08 |
| 2018 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 26–7–4 | 2.30 |
| 2018 | José MoraisK League 1 | 0–1–0 | 1.00 |
| 2017 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 22–9–7 | 1.97 |
| 2016 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 20–16–2 | 2.00 |
| 2015 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 22–7–9 | 1.92 |
| 2014 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 24–9–5 | 2.13 |
| 2013 | Fábio LefundesK League 1 | 6–3–4 | 1.62 |
| 2013 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 4–3–5 | 1.25 |
| 2012 | Kang-Hee ChoiK League 1 | 22–13–9 | 1.80 |
One row per season, which is the grain the source supplies — a manager who stayed four years appears four times. Points per game is what makes spells of different lengths comparable.
Results
| # | Club | Pl | GD | Pts | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 3 | +1 | 5 | Recent form, oldest first: W, D, D | <1% | |
| 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | Recent form, oldest first: D, L, W | <1% | |
| 9 | 3 | -2 | 3 | Recent form, oldest first: W, L, L | <1% | |
| 10 | 2 | -2 | 3 | Recent form, oldest first: L, W | 0% | |
| 11 | 3 | -3 | 3 | Recent form, oldest first: L, L, W | <1% | |
| 12 | 3 | -1 | 2 | Recent form, oldest first: D, D, L | <1% | |
| 13 | 3 | -2 | 1 | Recent form, oldest first: L, D, L | 0% |
* Level on points — separated by the tiebreaker shown on hover.
Title chances are Monte Carlo estimates over the remaining fixturesest. A shown 0% means it did not occur in 8,000 simulated seasons — not that it is impossible.